KESEPAKATAN PERDAMAIAN OLEH MEDIATOR DI LUAR PENGADILAN
PEACE AGREEMENT BY A MEDIATOR OUTSIDE COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34310/slj.v3i1.20Keywords:
Deed, Mediator, Peace AgreementAbstract
The formation of a Peace Agreement between the parties shows that the mediation process was successful in resolving the conflict outside of court, but its position is not the same as a Peace Deed produced through mediation and implemented in court. To find out the legal basis for the difference in legal position between a Peace Agreement and a Peace Deed, thus this essay will undertake a legal study and analysis to determine how to guarantee that the two peace products have equal legal standing—that is, a position of evaluation of permanent legal norms. This study was conducted utilizing descriptive analysis techniques with a normative legal approach, based on statutory regulations. The study's findings demonstrate that the Peace Agreement's legal standing is on par with those of comparable peace accords. The opposite party may file a lawsuit in order to obtain legal recompense if the other party breaches the agreement. In the meantime, the Deed of Peace is fully enforceable, meaning that whichever party loses just needs to ask the court for execution. There are legal actions to improve the legal status of the Peace Agreement to a Peace Deed through litigation, based on legal provisions in Law No. 30 of 1999 and Perma No. 1 of 2016, although in reality raising the legal status can be accomplished utilizing a hybrid Arb-Med
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku:
Abbas, Syahrizal, 2011, Mediasi dalam Hukum Syariah Hukum Adat dan Hukum Nasional, Kencana, Jakarta.
Adi Nugroho, Susanti, 2009, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, Prenada Media, Jakarta.Ali, Ahmad, 2008, Menguak Tabir Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Margono, Suyud, 2004, ADR dan Arbitrase: Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2013, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Edisi Revisi, Cahaya Atma Pusaka, Yogyakarta.
Projodikoro, Wirjono, 1980, Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia, Sumur, Bandung.Sumardjan, Solo, 2012, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Graha Ilmu, Tanggerang.
Usman, Rachmadi, 2003, Pilihan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Jurnal:
Hanifah, Mardalena, ‘Kajian Yuridis: Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
Smart Law Journal, 2024, 3(1) 56-70SLJ 2024https://journal.unkaha.com/index.php/sljpISSN 2830-6430; eISSN 2830-683X70Perdata di Pengadilan’, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Adhaper, Vol. 2, No. 1, Januari –Juni 2016.
Mulyana, Dedy, ‘Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif’, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Vol. 3, No. 2, September 2019.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
Burgerlijk Wetboek (S. 1847:23).
Het Herziene Inlandsch Reglement(S. 1941:44).
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) RI. Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan.
Sumber Lain:
Kelompok Kerja Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Mahkamah Agung RI, Buku Tanya Jawab Mediasi di Pengadilan, BerdasarkanPeraturan Mahkamah Agung No 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan, 2016.
Notulensi Wawancara dengan Fahmi Shahab (Executive Director dan Mediator Pusat Mediasi Nasional Jakarta), 9 Mei 2017
Utama, Meria and Romsan, A. and Zulhidayat, Zulhidayat, 2010, Penyelesaian Konfl ikPerbatasan melalui Tehnik Hybrid ADR Di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Pengembangan Model Hybrid Arbitrase Mediasi dengan Uji Coba Di Kabupaten Muara Enim dengan Ogan Ilir dan Kabupaten Musi Rawas dan Lubuk Linggau, Sriwijaya University Institutional Repository, Last Modified: 21 Nov 2019 13:13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Smart Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
